Loading

Posts by Paul Costello1

How life has gotten worse for immigrant children

Maya Lora8/6/2025 5:30 a.m. ED Baltimore Banner

Deportations are ramping up as benefits get slashed for mixed status families

The parents of the 10-year-old didn’t understand why there were cuts on their child’s arms.

It wasn’t until a routine physical that the child’s doctor, Sarah Polk, figured out the child had been self-harming out of fear their parents could get deported.

“[They] hadn’t wanted to upset anybody, hadn’t wanted to increase anybody’s stress, so hadn’t confided this fear in anybody else,” Polk said. “Cutting yourself is really a very profound sign of mental distress.”

The parents were able to talk to a professional about how to manage their child’s anxiety. But Polk, who works primarily with Latino children and immigrant families, worries that others aren’t getting the same mental and physical help. She has noticed more patients skipping doctors’ appointments as immigration enforcement picks up near their health center. Scared families are keeping low profiles at home, away from the eye of law enforcement.

Life for kids in immigrant families has changed under President Donald Trump’s second term. In ways that aren’t always visible to parents, they are dealing with increasing uncertainty and isolation as deportations ramp up.Polk said she also worries about the anti-immigrant rhetoric kids could be internalizing as they form their identities.

Since Trump reentered office, deportations have more than doubled in Maryland while increasingly targeting immigrants without criminalcharges or convictions. At the same time, the federal government is trying to curtail access to programs like free early childhood centers, the child tax credit and extra instruction for students learning English — all of which impact the quality of life for kids in immigrant families.

Dr. Sarah Polk works primarily with Latino and immigrant families, and has seen families pull back from services with the recent threat of deportation. (Kaitlin Newman/The Baltimore Banner)

Some of those kids could also soon lose access to Head Start, which provides free early childhood education for low-income families. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services recently reclassified certain social services as “federal public benefits” to lock undocumented immigrants out, reversing decades of precedent. That includes Head Start.

The Trump administration has paused implementing the ban until Sept. 4 in 20 states that have sued over the policy change, including Maryland.

Some who work with Head Start said parents may pull their kids from classrooms even if their child is technically eligible but lives in a mixed-immigration status household. Head Start has never required a check on children’s immigration statuses, and some families, like those experiencing homelessness, may not have documentation. The ban could alter relationships between Head Start programs and already frightened communities.

Tommy Sheridan, the deputy director at the National Head Start Association, said investing in the program leads to more parents working, more children hitting their development milestones and fewer families relying on public assistance.

“Our priority is on the well-being, the safety for young children and their families,” Sheridan said. “And we’re concerned and, frankly, alarmed that this could threaten that.”

The head of the Maryland Family Network, the largest grantee of Early Head Start dollars in the state, said the change punishes children “who have no role in coming here or where they were born or what their parents did before they existed.”

“Turning away any child — and we’re talking about babies, toddlers, preschoolers here — from their opportunity to have a strong start in life and a prosperous future and a resilient family, is antithetical to what the supposed American dream is,” Laura Weeldreyer said.

Maryland Family Network oversees 16 Early Head Start centers for infants and toddlers, mostly in places where there’s already a shortage of child care options, Weeldreyer said. In Baltimore, regulated child care is only available to 20% of infants.

Weeldreyer fears that families will turn to unregulated care if they even suspect Head Start will turn away their child or that ICE, which can now make arrests at schools and day cares, might show up. Parents cobbling together care across family and neighbors, changing who their children are with each day, can be “stressful for babies,” she said.

Child care operators could lose revenue and staff when fear keeps immigrants home. In Maryland, 29% of early educators were born outside the U.S. Day care and preschool closures can drive up prices for all families, as they did after the pandemic.

Monday, July 21, 2025 — An empty classroom at Weinberg Early Childhood Center in Baltimore City, Md.
As the federal government tries to curtail access to programs some immigrants benefited from, one major loss could be the Head Start program. (Florence Shen/The Baltimore Banner)

Cuts could keep coming for kids beyond their earliest years. Federal funds dedicated to teaching English to students who speak other languages were part of the billions withheld from school systems that had already budgeted the cash.

It’s not just childless adults: Kids could get hurt by Medicaid, SNAP cuts

Though the U.S. Department of Education has promised to restore this year’s congressionally appropriated funds, those earmarked for English learners are not in Trump’s budget for next fiscal year said Lina Lenis, a policy analyst for K-12 education for UnidosUS.

Lenis said the money helps those students get to a place where they no longer need the extra help. In Maryland, 11.2% of public school students are English learners, Lenis said.

“They start to fall behind in math and science because they can’t access their education meaningfully,” she said.

School resources could also be stretched by a “much greater number of children experiencing some degree of mental distress” said Polk, a co-director at Johns Hopkins’ Centro SOL for Latino families. While children are resilient, struggles with depression or anxiety could hurt kids’ performance in school or how they make friends. There’s a “small but real” risk of self-harm and suicide.

Polk said she worries about people “suffering in silence together,” with kids trying to put their parents first, like the 10-year-old worried about deportation.

“It’s really a tremendous act of generosity to remain silent, but it doesn’t help anybody,” Polk said. “Because the parents know that their child isn’t OK.”

About the Education Hub

This reporting is part of The Banner’s Education Hub, community-funded journalism that provides parents with resources they need to make decisions about how their children learn. Read more.

Maya Lora

https://www.thebaltimorebanner.com/education/early-childhood/anti-immigrant-deportations-worsen-kids-lives-LVEIO4XSYVH4PPA5WSXNAMYZR4/?schk=YES&rchk=YES&utm_source=The+Baltimore+Banner&utm_campaign=652510a6eb-NL_ALRT_MR_20250806_1200&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_fed75856d2-652510a6eb-592168624&mc_cid=652510a6eb&mc_eid=fe12c291d2

I opted my kids out of a school lesson. Was that hypocritical?

Marc Fisher Associate editor and columnist focusing on Washington and its suburbs Washington Post July 30th 2025

Chris and Melissa Persak chose to live in Montgomery County, Maryland, the most religiously heterogeneous county in the nation, expressly because, Chris says, “we want to enjoy the diversity of our community.”M

The Persaks are Catholics who had two daughters in Montgomery County’s public schools a couple of years ago when their older child, then 9, came home with a book she’d taken out of her elementary school’s library. It was called “My Maddy,” and she had chosen it because Maddy is her sister’s name. The book turned out to be a story about a parent who is neither a Mommy nor a Daddy, but a combination of the two — a “Maddy.”

The Persaks, who believe that “a person’s biological sex is a gift bestowed by God that is both unchanging and integral to that person’s being,” as their lawyer later put it, did not like this book’s message.

As Supreme Court Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. wrote in June in the case the Persaks had been pursuing for three years, the school board in their affluent D.C. suburb had introduced “LGBTQ+-inclusive” storybooks into the lower grades’ curriculum to “disrupt” children’s thinking about sexuality and gender.

The Persaks quickly learned that books similar to “My Maddy” were being assigned in their children’s classrooms to teach about human sexuality. They found out that Maryland law had long allowed parents to opt their kids out of sexuality lessons — except those on menstruation — that parents felt violated their religious beliefs. But when the Persaks asked about opting their daughter out, they were told that the rules had changed: Montgomery County Public Schools had moved instruction about “LGBTQ+ inclusion” out of the family life curriculum and into the English curriculum, allowing the school system to get around the state’s opt-out law.

The Persaks, and parents who agreed with them, could not opt out, nor could they get advance notice of when such books were to be used.

To zip ahead in this years-long story, the Supreme Court ruled last month in a 6-3 decision that the county must let parents opt their kids out of what Alito called “instruction that poses ‘a very real threat of undermining’ the religious beliefs and practices that the parents wish to instill.”

When school starts next month, the Persaks and other parents in their case expect to be informed about what books are being used and to get a chance to pull their kids out of lessons they believe conflict with their beliefs about “the biblical way to properly express romantic and sexual desires,” as their lawyer, Eric S. Baxter, wrote in his brief.

I speak with a forked tongue about this issue. The whole notion that parents have the right to determine what and how their children are taught in school strikes me as just one more reflexive rejection of expertise in a society increasingly enraptured with the notion that anyone is qualified to do anything. (“Hand me that scalpel, Dr. Surgeon — lemme show you how we do that back home!”)

Yet when the opportunity arose years ago, my wife and I joined other parents at our kids’ school in pushing to opt our children out of a grossly inappropriate lesson on the Holocaust that included showing the annoyingsimplistic and wildly ahistorical 1997 film “Life Is Beautiful.”

How appallingly hypocritical of me. Or maybe not. This issue turns out to be one more example of how some of the best American institutions are designed to encourage compromise: Schools are generally built to protect the experts’ ability to deliver as their professions think best. Educators should decide what curriculum and what books best teach the next generation, just as judges get to interpret the law and doctors ought to lead patients toward the most efficacious treatments.

But each of those systems was also built to safeguard the public’s ability to weigh in:Just as jurors and voters serve as checks on judges and prosecutors, parents can use their votes to pick school board members and state legislators, who in turn can curb the excesses of educators.

Which takes us back to Montgomery County.

I asked to speak with the MCPS officials deciding how schools will comply with the court’s ruling this fall. That request was denied. The school system’s spokeswoman, Liliana Lopez, offered this statement: “We are working to determine next steps in order to meet the expectations of the Court’s ruling and remain true to our shared values of learning, relationships, respect, excellence and equity.” She said MCPS will update families and staffers before school starts.

Persak hasn’t heard from his daughters’ school. He expects MCPS to, as his lawyer put it, “rebuild trust with parents whom they slandered.” (At least one Montgomery County elected official said pro-opt-out parents were on the same side as “white supremacists and outright bigots.”)Advertisement

I hope the school system reaches out to parents who want to opt their kids out of lessons on sexuality. And I hope the county stands firm against those who would expand parents’ roles in choosing books and lessons. The last thing the county needs is the kind of cleansing of bookshelves now happening in nearby Virginia, where school boards have removed 223 books from libraries in the past five years.

Educators deserve to decide how best to achieve society’s goals in the classroom. And parents get to push back with their votes and, ultimately, by asserting their authority to raise their children as they see fit. All of this is inherently contradictory — and that’s exactly as it should be. The beauty of the system lies in the tension between opposing ideas.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/07/30/public-schools-sexuality-parents-montgomery-county/

What is MyScore?

MyScore is an innovative Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) tool and framework primarily used in educational settings, particularly in programs like <<Link: AmeriCorps Project CHANGE https://www.projectchangemaryland.org/theroy-of-change-myscore/}>.

It is not a new tool, it was developed in 2016. Here’s a breakdown of what MyScore is and how it functions as an SEL tool:1. Focus on the “5 C’s”

  • MyScore is built around helping students develop five key elements believed to be crucial for learning success: Confidence, Curiosity (excitement about learning), Collaboration (working with others), Courage (resilience in adversity), and Career-Future focus (optimism).
  • It specifically targets students who may have developed negative self-narratives, emphasizing self-belief and positive self-talk as essential for overcoming academic and personal challenges. 

2. Narrative-based approach

  • MyScore employs a narrative approach, acknowledging that students’ “stories about themselves” deeply impact their learning experiences.
  • It aims to help students identify and challenge negative self-perceptions, and in collaboration with mentors, to build a “new story of possibility”. 

3. Tool and methodology

  • MyScore utilizes a set of colorful cards with questions related to the 5 C’s, designed for self-reflection and assessment.
  • It is administered at various points (Pre, Middle, and Post) to track student progress and growth in the identified SEL areas.
  • Trained AmeriCorps members act as mentors, guiding students through the MyScore process and supporting them in developing their SEL skills. 

4. Addressing inequities and promoting well-being

  • MyScore is particularly focused on supporting students in high-need populations who may be experiencing poverty, racism, trauma, or language barriers.
  • The approach recognizes that addressing students’ social-emotional needs is fundamental for achieving educational equity and promoting overall well-being. 

5. Potential benefits

  • Research and experience with MyScore suggest that it can lead to improvements in areas like self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, and responsible decision-making.
  • Studies have shown that students engaged in SEL programs can demonstrate improved academic achievement, better pro-social behavior, and fewer emotional and classroom management problems. 

In essence, MyScore serves as an SEL tool to empower students, particularly those facing adversity, to develop essential social and emotional skills that can foster a greater sense of self-belief, engagement with learning, and ultimately, success in school and life. 

www.myscore.space

Gallup Survey Details Gen Z Struggles with Stress, Anxiety and “Need to be Perfect”

Gallup poll reveals how teens cope with negative emotions — and why 'they  want to be heard' | Fox News

Education July 30, 2024 Walton Family Foundation

Research reveals techniques that families can deploy to emotionally prepare children for the upcoming school year

Washington, D.C., July 30, 2024 – Gallup and the Walton Family Foundation today announced a new research series with Dr. Lisa Damour, best-selling author and clinical psychologist, to advance their ongoing work on the experiences of Gen Z.

Along with Dr. Damour, they will explore the relationships that 10- to- 18-year-old Gen Z children have with their parents, the support systems that children and parents rely on, and how both groups navigate the preteen and teenage years.

“Parents want to understand their kids’ emotional lives and to know how to offer support,” said Dr. Damour. “My partnership with Gallup and the Walton Family Foundation illuminates key points: along with their uncomfortable emotions, young people feel a great deal of happiness; they have effective strategies for helping themselves feel better when they’re upset; and they want to feel heard and be taken seriously by adults.”Media ContactDonielle LeeSenior Communications Officerdlee@wffmail.com

To mark the launch of the research series, and ahead of the start of the new school year, Gallup, Dr. Damour and the foundation released a new survey of 1,675 10- to 18-year-old children and their parents or guardians.

The data shows young people are using a range of healthy coping mechanisms. These can be leveraged by families to help children overcome uncomfortable emotions and prepare them for the stress of a new school year. Gen Z youth are most likely to manage challenging feelings by listening to music (58%), playing video games (45%), connecting with friends (45%) and talking about their feelings (39%). Only 20% reported turning to social media when upset.

“These new findings suggest that the negative emotions many Gen Zers feel are closely related to the pressure they feel to be perfect,” said Stephanie Marken, Gallup senior partner. “Prior Gallup research has found that children who frequently experience negative emotions are more likely to say that they also struggle in school, so helping Gen Z to cope with these emotions – as well as their underlying causes – is critically important to their academic and future success.”

The new survey also demonstrates that the emotional lives of preteens and teenagers are marked by more ups than downs. Nearly all children (94%) say that they felt happiness a lot of the prior day, but 45% also felt stressed, 38% felt anxious and 23% felt sad.

Parents also have a role to play in helping their children manage their emotions. According to the young Gen Z respondents, 62% say they want their parents to listen to them when they are upset, yet only 28% want their parents to give advice. Younger Gen Z children are more likely to want reassurance and physical comfort from their parents, while teenagers are 20 percentage points more likely than 10- to 12-year-olds to say they want their parents to give them space when they are upset. While 35% of parents say their child has very intense emotions, more than eight in 10 parents feel confident in their ability to comfort and communicate with their child when they are struggling with their emotions.

Overall, one-third of Gen Z children say they feel pressure to be perfect. That sentiment is higher among 13- to 15-year-olds (38%) and is especially high among girls (40%). Whether Gen Z children report feeling negative emotions is closely related to their propensity to feel the need to be perfect. Those who say they need to be perfect are 23 to 30 percentage points more likely than those who do not feel that pressure to say they felt anxious, sad and stressed a lot of the prior day.

Throughout the summer and fall, Dr. Damour, Gallup and the foundation will release further research and analysis about the relationship between Gen Z children and their parents.

Methodology

Results are based on a Gallup Panel web survey conducted Mar. 13-20, 2024, with 1,675 parents aged 18 and older, and their 10- to 18-year-old children. The Gallup Panel is a probability-based panel of U.S. adults, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, who are randomly selected using address-based sampling methodology. Gallup also recruits using random-digit-dial phone interviews that cover landline and cellphones.

Parents were eligible to complete the survey if they indicated they had at least one child living in their household between the ages of 10 and 18. If there were multiple children between the ages of 10 and 18 in the household, parents were asked to answer questions about the child who would have the next birthday. After completing their section of the survey, parents were asked to pass the survey to that child, who then completed their section of the survey.

For results based on the total sample of adult parents, the margin of sampling error is +/-3.3 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. For results based on the total sample of 10- to 18-year-old children, the margin of sampling error is +/-3.3 percentage points at the 95% confidence level.

All reported margins of sampling error include computed design effects for weighting. In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.

About the Walton Family Foundation

The Walton Family Foundation is, at its core, a family-led foundation. Three generations of the descendants of our founders, Sam and Helen Walton, and their spouses work together to lead the foundation and create access to opportunity for people and communities. We work in three areas: improving education, protecting rivers and oceans and the communities they support, and investing in our home region of Northwest Arkansas and the Arkansas-Mississippi Delta. To learn more, visit waltonfamilyfoundation.org and follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

About Gallup

Gallup delivers analytics and advice to help leaders and organizations solve their most pressing problems. Combining more than 80 years of experience with its global reach, Gallup knows more about the attitudes and behaviors of employees, customers, students and citizens than any other organization in the world.


https://www.waltonfamilyfoundation.org/about-us/newsroom/gallup-survey-details-gen-z-struggles-with-stress-anxiety-and-need-to-be-perfect

Want to help support your Gen Z kids? Talking really helps

A young student struggles to carry a large heavy backpack, symbolizing the worries that can accompany the transition back-to-school.

NPR August 27, 20249:48 AM ET Andee Tagle

For many pre-teens and teens, a new school year brings big changes: new routines, different classes and changing friendships (both in real life and online).

Parents can help kids navigate these transitions by understanding their feelings and finding ways to better support them. A survey published in July 2024 provides fresh insight into the emotional landscape of today’s Gen Z youth.

Conducted by the Walton Family Foundation (a funder of NPR) and Gallup, in partnership with teen psychologist Lisa Damour, the group surveyed 1,675 children ages 10 to 18 and one of their guardians. It found that Gen Z kids felt pressure to be perfect and increased negative emotions like anxiety, especially among girls and teens.Sponsor Message

Being a pre-teen and teen has always been hard, says Damour. But this generation of children faces unique challenges. “We’re asking a lot of them academically. They are trying to navigate a social media environment that can be very taxing for them.”

“And young people worry about big things, like their future,” she adds. About two-thirds of Gen Z youth worry about what the world will be like when they are adults, according to the survey.

Damour, author of UntangledUnder Pressure and The Emotional Lives of Teenagers, talks to NPR about what parents can learn from the findings from the Gallup study.

😇 Remind your teen they don’t have to be perfect 

About one in three Gen Zers struggle with perfectionism, according to the survey — especially girls, teens and oldest children.

That can affect a child’s self esteem, says Damour. The study found that those who say they need to be perfect were “more likely than those who do not feel that pressure to say they felt anxious, sad and stressed a lot the prior day.”

So help your teen get comfortable with making mistakes, she says. “Let them recognize the mistake while still having a general sense of positive self-regard.

Tell them that “while we are working on our shortcomings, we still can feel we are good, worthy and decent,” she says.

And make sure they hear from you that they don’t need to be perfect — it may help reduce negative emotions that come with striving for perfection, according to the report.

🗣️ Talk to your teen. They want to hear from you 

About one in six parents struggle to comfort their child or communicate with them when they are upset, found the survey. They assume that their teens don’t want to talk to them, or may not be receptive to a conversation.

“But what we heard from teenagers is how helpful these conversations are and how much they care about what adults have to say,” says Damour. “So my advice to anyone caring for a teenager is to go ahead and have a conversation about whatever it is you’re worried about.”

How to show up for teens when big emotions arise

If you’re not sure what to do, just listen, she says. That was the No. 1 response when Damour asked the teens: What can adults do to be helpful when you’re upset? “Second to that: ‘Take our feelings seriously.’ Very low down the list was ‘offer advice.’ “

Look for natural openings in everyday conversation to bring up your concerns, she says. “Once your kid is talking about it, that is a great time to say, ‘it sounds like your friend’s having a hard time at school. How are things feeling for you at school?’ “

🎢 Be OK with your kid’s roller coaster of emotions 

The emotional lives of preteens and teenagers are complex, according to the findings. Nearly all the children surveyed said they “felt happiness a lot of the prior day,” but 45% also felt stressed, 38% anxious and 23% sad.

“The takeaway here is that kids have lots of moods, good and bad,” says Damour.

In general, teens have more intense emotions, says Damour. “But it’s not a sign that anything is wrong. It’s actually a sign of forward development.”

Parents can better navigate big mood swings by “thinking about it the way psychologists think about it: having feelings that fit what’s happening — and managing those feelings,” she says.

How to talk — and listen — to a teen with mental health struggles

“If your kid isn’t invited to a party that all their friends seem to be going to, they will be sad. That is the expected emotion. It would be strange if they didn’t feel it,” says Damour.

Kids already have great coping skills that they turn to comfort themselves, according to the report. “Maybe they have a good cry, cuddle their dog, go for a run,” says Damour. Parents should only worry “if they’re using coping strategies that are harmful.”

In other words, it is OK to have negative emotions. It’s what we do with them that counts, she says.


The digital story was written by Malaka Gharib and edited by Andee Tagle and Meghan Keane. The visual editor is Beck Harlan.

We’d love to hear from you. email us at LifeKit@npr.org. Listen to Life Kit on Apple Podcasts and Spotify, or sign up for our newsletter.

https://www.npr.org/2024/08/27/g-s1-19635/a-new-poll-reveals-the-worries-of-gen-z-kids-and-how-parents-can-support-them

Pandemic Hurt Children’s Social Skills, Mental Health Most

Parents report fewer negative effects on children’s physical health and math, reading, science skills by Megan Brenan  March 13 2025 Gallup 

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Looking back on the COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on their school-age children, U.S. parents are more likely to report negative social and emotional issues than academic or physical health troubles.

Gallup’s latest update to its COVID-19 tracking poll finds that 45% of parents of school-age children say the pandemic has had a negative impact on their child’s social skills development. Half of them, 22%, report the social difficulty is ongoing, while the other half, 23%, say it has eased. Similarly, 42% of these parents say their child’s mental health has been negatively affected by the pandemic, including 21% who say the issue persists.

In terms of academics, at least three in 10 parents say the pandemic negatively impacted their child’s skills in math (36%), reading (31%) or science (30%), with roughly half of each group saying the effects are ongoing. Fewer parents (23%) say the pandemic negatively affected their child’s physical health.

Meanwhile, solid majorities of K-12 parents — ranging from 56% to 69% — say there was no effect on their child’s physical health or math, reading or science skills. Fewer say the same about their child’s social skills development (47%) and mental health (52%). No more than 10% of parents say their child was positively affected by the pandemic in any of the six areas measured.

These results are based on U.S. parents or guardians who have had a child in kindergarten through 12th grade within the past five years, encompassing years when schools faced significant disruption from the COVID-19 health emergency. The survey was conducted by web Feb. 18-26, using Gallup’s probability-based panel.

Previously released findings from the same poll show that while six in 10 Americans say the pandemic is over (59%), a similar percentage worry about seeing another pandemic in their lifetime (58%). In addition, 47% of U.S. adults say their life is completely back to the normal that existed before the pandemic, while 13% expect it to eventually return to pre-pandemic normalcy and 40% think life will never get back to normal.

Parents’ Assessments of Pandemic’s Impact on Children Differ Most by Grade Level

K-12 parents’ impressions of the pandemic’s impact on children diverge most based on their child’s grade level at the start of the pandemic, in March 2020.

Parents of middle school students (who were in sixth through eighth grade at the beginning of the pandemic) are more likely than parents of elementary (kindergarten through fifth grade) or high school students (grades nine through 12) to report ongoing negative effects. This is the case for all six areas compared with elementary school students, and for social skills, math, reading and science compared with high school students.

While partisans’ views of many aspects of the pandemic differ sharply, K-12 parents’ reports of its negative effects on their child’s life are similar across party lines. Differences by other demographic subgroups are minimal, aside from a significant discrepancy in the percentages of women (25%) and men (16%) reporting their child suffers an ongoing negative effect on their mental health.

Implications

In March 2020, the spread of COVID-19 caused the shuttering of U.S. schools and a switch to remote learning across the country for the remainder of the school year. Many districts remained remote for portions of the 2020-2021 school year as well.

More than four in 10 parents of K-12 students say their child’s social skills development and mental health were negatively impacted by the pandemic, and more than two in 10 say the negative effects on these children’s social and emotional development continue today. Fewer parents report adverse impacts on their child’s academics — including math, reading and science — or their physical health. Middle schoolers were the most negatively impacted.

Although parents’ perceptions show relatively minimal ongoing academic effects, government data tracking students’ performance in math, reading, science and writing since 1969 in “The Nation’s Report Card” tell a different story. The report recently found that while students have made up at least some of the ground they lost during the pandemic in math, their reading and math scores remain below pre-pandemic levels. Federal COVID-relief aid has been credited with the improvements by some, but President Donald Trump’s plan to eliminate the Department of Education could affect future funding.

To stay up to date with the latest Gallup News insights and updates, follow us on X @Gallup.

Learn more about how the Gallup Panel works.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/658100/pandemic-hurt-children-social-skills-mental-health.aspx

New study shows social media use predicted future depression in tweens

By Caitlin Gibson Washington Post June 26th 2025

As American adolescents experience both declining mental health and rising exposure to social media, parents and researchers alike have tried to better understand the link between the two: Does social media fuel mental health struggles? Or are struggling kids more likely to turn to social media?

A new study indicates a possible answer. When researchers at the University of California at San Francisco examined social media use and depressive symptoms among tweens over a three-year period, they found that an increase in social media use predicted a future rise in symptoms of depression — but not the other way around.Advertisement

The study, published in May in the journal JAMA Network Open, followed nearly 12,000 preteens over three years starting at age 9 to 10. The lead author of the study, Jason Nagata, an associate professor of pediatrics at the University of California at San Francisco, spoke to The Washington Post about his team’s findings and observations.

Social media use jumped during the tween years, and depression symptoms followed

Daily social media use among study participants surged tenfold over those years, from about seven minutes per day at age 9, to 74 minutes per day by age 13. During that same time frame, reported depression symptoms jumped 35 percent.

“Social media does seem to be a risk factor for future depression, or worsening depressive symptoms,” Nagata says. “But kids who were already depressed didn’t necessarily report using social media more in subsequent years.” The emergence of this pattern, he says, is “a new finding.”

The data was drawn from the national Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study, which includes a racially and economically diverse sample of children in the largest long-term study of brain development and child health ever conducted in the U.S. Nagata says, “One of the advantages of this study, over prior studies, is that it follows these same kids, every year.”Advertisement

Other factors — such as genetics or societal influences, like the coronavirus pandemic — can also play a role in determining whether a child might develop depression, Nagata says. But while those are largely outside individual control, he notes, identifying social media as a factor is significant because “to some extent, people can make changes in their daily lives” to reduce that risk.

Efforts to restrict access to social media don’t seem to be working

“Technically, the minimum age requirement for most social media platforms is 13 years old,” Nagata says — yet at the start of their study, 20 percent of 9- and 10-year-olds had social media accounts, and by age 11 or 12, two-thirds of them did. On average, those children had accounts on three platforms, Nagata says; TikTok was the most common, followed by Instagram and Snapchat.

This is something policymakers should be aware of, he says. “To me, this study shows that age verification does not work currently. Even though we have rules and laws, it does seem like most kids are tech savvy enough that they can get around them.”

Cyberbullying is a possible driver of depressive symptoms

Using data from the same cohort of adolescents, Nagata and his colleagues also conducted a separate study — published in the Lancet Regional Health — Americas journal — that helps explain whysocial media might be predictive of depression symptoms. That study found that children age 11 to 12 who experienced cyberbullying were more than twice as likely to report experiencing suicidal ideation or a suicide attempt within the following year; they were also more than twice as likely to experiment with substance use, including marijuana, alcohol and tobacco, Nagata says.

Cyberbullying, he says, is a singular torment for tweens. “In general, with school-based bullying, you know who the perpetrator is, and they’re doing it to your face, and they’re limited to bullying activities when you’re physically in the presence of each other,” he says. But with cyberbullying, “the bullying can be constant, in your bedroom, overnight. And sometimes the bullies are anonymous. It can be adults; it can be from a fake account; it can be from somebody across the world.”

Phone use is displacing other crucial activities, like sleep

Another way that social media use might cause or intensify depressive symptoms is simply through “displacement,” Nagata says. “We only have 24 hours in the day, and the more time that kids are spending on screens and on social media, even if content is fine and they’re not being bullied — that’s still time that they’re not spending doing other things that could be good for their health, like sleep or physical activity.”Advertisement

Sleep, in particular, is critical for mental health, physical health and brain development, he says, which is why the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that kids put phones away an hour before bedtime. “But we found that that window was the most active time of use for most of these preteens,” he says. “Right before bed, they’re messaging friends from their bedroom.”

Their research found that 63 percent of those teens reported that they had a phone or electronic device in their bedroom overnight, he says, and 17 percent said they had been awakened by notifications within the past week. “The best thing is to have the phone outside the room,” he says.

Parents need a plan — which includes evaluating their own screen use

For parents, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends creating a family media plan for the household — and parents will need to follow those agreed-upon guidelines, too. Nagata notes that “one of the biggest predictors of preteen screen use is adult screen use.”

As parents choose their battles, he adds, he recommends focusing on limits around bedtime and mealtimes. Research has also shown that when people are distracted by screens while eating, “they tend to overeat, even when they’re not hungry,” he says; and they also miss out on the opportunity to have conversation and connection with their family. “To the extent possible that we can make sure that media use isn’t affecting [a child’s] sleep, that it isn’t replacing in-person activities or physical activities — those are ways that you can really try to mitigate the harms.”

And now is as good a time as any to create a new family plan: “Depending on what kids are doing over the summer, there could be big changes in media use ahead,” he says. “So this is a good time for parents to be having these discussions.”correction

A previous version of this article incorrectly said the study was published in the American Medical Journal’s association journal JAMA. This study was published in the journal JAMA Network Open.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2025/06/11/social-media-use-depression-tweens/

Alain de Bottom

On Confidence

Are you a proper grown-up? Philosopher and founder of The School of Life, Alain de Botton, joins us with a guide to facing life’s challenges with confidence, kindness and good-natured intelligence. 

True emotional maturity is a state few of us ever reach – or at least not for very long. But it may help us to try to lay out what some of its constituent parts are so that we have an idea what we might aim for.

Alain will prompt us to look at how we respond to rejection, frustration, anxiety, ambiguity and hope by asking questions such as: How much do you like yourself? Do you worry too much about the opinions of other people? What might be the best way to become a more interesting person?

read more

Video

They Didn’t Just Kill Some Program. They Killed a Piece of America.

They Didn’t Just Kill Some Program. They Killed a Piece of America.


By Patrick Hamilton Jun 09, 2025 The Fulcrum is a platform where insiders and outsiders to politics are informed, meet, talk, and act to repair our democracy and make it live and work in our everyday lives.

In 2019, I joined AmeriCorps National Civilian Community Corps – NCCC – a national service program that deployed young people across the country to build homes, restore ecosystems, respond to disasters, and strengthen communities. Today, that program no longer exists.

One of the last institutions uniting Americans across class, race, and region is gone. Quietly shut down. Not because it failed, but because it worked.

I was born American but raised abroad. My parents were U.S. diplomats. I grew up moving between countries, watching them try to embody the best of this country’s ideals. But I had no real sense of what it meant to live here — among the people they represented.

That changed in 2019 when I deferred college to join NCCC. I didn’t want to sit in a classroom. I wanted to build things, work with my hands, and meet the people who make up this country. I wanted to understand what it meant to be American. And through this program, I did.

They flew me to Colorado, where I met my team: Job Corps graduates, foster youth, Native Americans, kids who had been homeless just months earlier, recent high school grads like me, and college students who’d put their studies on hold. We came from everywhere — small towns, big cities, tribal lands, military families, immigrant households.

My first project was in Greeley, a working-class town on the Colorado plains, shaped by meatpacking plants and immigrant labor. That winter was brutal. The wind cut through our jackets, and when the factories were running, the smell of burned bone drifted across the snow. We lived packed into bunk beds in the basement of the local Habitat for Humanity office, learning how to build homes from the ground up. Even with blistered hands, we framed walls, installed siding, and weatherproofed roofs. And when the work was done, we handed over keys to families — many of them immigrants — who had spent years working toward the chance to own a home. I remember one woman crying as she turned the lock. That moment, standing beside my teammates and watching her step inside, made me feel part of something larger than myself.

One weekend, a local family invited us to their mountain ranch. In exchange for a home-cooked chili dinner, we hiked into the Rockies and helped cut down their Christmas tree. I stood there with chili simmering on the stove, snow falling outside, the Rockies stretching into silence. And I thought: I can’t believe this is our country.

In AmeriCorps, working side by side with strangers to build something real, I came to understand a different kind of citizenship. Not the kind you wave a flag for, but the kind lived out in calloused hands, tight budgets, and early mornings spent helping people you’ve never met. It

was unglamorous, yes, but transformative. It created a new kind of citizen — one who looks outward, who defines patriotism not by symbols but by service. By the work itself.

Later, we were deployed to the Altar Valley, a blistering stretch of southern Arizona desert near one of the most heavily trafficked migrant crossings in the country. Officially, we were there to restore habitat for endangered species like the masked bobwhite quail. But the land told other stories. We found bloodied socks. Prayer beads. Torn fabric. The debris of survival. And death – often less than a mile over the border these people had suffered so long to reach.

Outside our bunkhouse on the National Wildlife Refuge, we lived among a complicated cast: ranchers, conservationists, desert wanderers chasing freedom. We crossed paths with Border Patrol agents, local sheriffs, even armed militiamen. Some were driven by ideology, others by fear or habit. We met them in diners, on back roads, at remote checkpoints. Many were hardened by the terrain. But none spoke about immigration like politicians do. Their words came from proximity — to the desert, the desperation, and the bodies that crossed it.

AmeriCorps gave me a chance to see what most Americans — and certainly most politicians — never do: the human cost of bad policy, the quiet strength of forgotten places, and the hard truth of this beautiful, complicated country.

Our team, like all NCCC teams, became a family. We stretched $4-a-day meal stipends into celebratory dinners. We took turns cooking, led meditations on cracked basketball courts, played music, and watched the stars. Somewhere between hauling wood and washing dishes, I found not just friends but a deeper belief in what America could be.

The program changed my future. I received a $6,000 education award from NCCC. That money meant I didn’t need a second job during college. I could pay rent, buy a laptop, and throw myself into editing my college paper — work that led me to journalism, to advocacy, to where I am today.

Since 1994, more than one million Americans have served in AmeriCorps. Each year, around 75,000 participate: tutoring kids, building homes, responding to disasters, restoring trails and ecosystems. NCCC was its most hands-on branch — full-time, team-based, deeply immersive.

Some call it “soft infrastructure.” But there was nothing soft about it. It was civic scaffolding — the human backbone of our democracy. When floods came, when wildfires tore through towns, when other systems failed, AmeriCorps teams were there. Not with speeches or slogans but with boots on the ground, sleeves rolled up, doing the work.

And it worked. According to Columbia University, every $1 spent on national service returns nearly $4 to society — in reduced public spending, higher earnings, better educational outcomes, and stronger civic engagement. AmeriCorps alums are more likely to vote, volunteer, and pursue service careers.

So why kill a program like that? Because it was everything they hate: public, hopeful, effective, and fair.

The decision to dismantle NCCC was ideological vandalism, part of a broader assault on civic institutions by those who believe government is the enemy. But AmeriCorps wasn’t bloated. It wasn’t partisan. It was a pure expression of what government can do right.

And destroying it wasn’t just wrong — it was unlawful. The executive branch had no authority to eliminate AmeriCorps NCCC, a program created and funded by Congress. It wasn’t theirs to take. That’s not just overreach. It’s theft — from the public, from the communities we served, and from every young American who still dreams of serving something greater than themselves.

The shutdown wasn’t abstract. It left real people stranded. When my friends still serving were abruptly pulled from their posts — no warning, no explanation — they were left not just unemployed but disillusioned. And the communities they were serving? Abandoned. Just ask the families in Alaska whose after-school programs disappeared overnight; the towns in Mississippi where food access and outreach efforts were suddenly halted; or the conservation teams in Tahoe forced to leave trails unfinished and fragile habitats unrestored. That’s just the tip of the iceberg — cuts that will echo for years, weakening the very communities AmeriCorps existed to strengthen.

This isn’t bureaucracy gone wrong. It’s sabotage — a willful betrayal of the country these programs were built to serve.

What kind of leadership fears young people helping one another? What kind of government sees citizenship, empathy, and shared service as threats?

The kind that feeds on division. The kind that cannot survive an engaged, connected public. The kind that sees unity as danger and despair as strategy.

AmeriCorps NCCC wasn’t flashy. It didn’t make headlines. But it changed lives. It shaped mine. And it gave thousands of young Americans the tools to serve something larger than themselves.

They didn’t just end a program. They extinguished a light — one that showed us what America could still become.

Congress must investigate this violation, denounce it, and reverse it. Future leaders must restore what was lost, what has been wasted, and what never should have been destroyed to begin with. You don’t destroy something like AmeriCorps unless you’re trying to destroy the country that made it. Let history remember who did this — and why.

Patrick Hamilton is a former AmeriCorps National Civilian Community Corps member and a recent graduate of Loyola University New Orleans, where he was editor-in-chief of The Loyola Maroon, a nationally award-winning student newspaper. He writes on civic life, democracy, and public service.

https://thefulcrum.us/bridging-common-ground/americorps-impact-on-us

Rethinking Resilience

Rethinking Resilience

By Alene Dawson June 24, 2025 Templeton Foundation

Resilience has been cast in the glow of the heroic comeback: the cancer survivor turned bestselling author, the amputee who runs a marathon, the refugee who becomes a congresswoman, the penniless single mother who becomes an environmental lawyer and saves her polluted hometown. But most resilience doesn’t make the headlines. It doesn’t always roar. Sometimes it’s the quiet decision to just keep going – to get out of bed, to show up, to begin again.

As spring concludes with a fanfare of flowers, reminding us of fresh starts, second chances and hope, let us remember that even the smallest acts of resilience matter, and through them, we rise.

Common Misconceptions About Resilience

Resilience vs Recovery

“One way to think about resilience is the ability to recover from or successfully manage obstacles, challenges, adversity – in some case trauma,” says professor Eranda Jayawickreme, a psychologist at Wake Forest University. “Being resilient doesn’t always mean bouncing back quickly. It can also mean recovering gradually.”

Psychologists often distinguish between resilience and recovery, he explains.

“Resilience means maintaining your level of functioning despite a major life challenge. It feels a bit like hardiness. You can power through without much change in your day-to-day function.”

“Resilience means maintaining your level of functioning despite a major life challenge. It feels a bit like hardiness. You can power through without much change in your day-to-day function.”

Recovery, by contrast, is when, after a challenging life event, you’re thrown off at first, reacting, trying to figure out the best coping strategies, but over time, recover and return to baseline. “Hardiness and recovery are variances of resilience,” says Jayawickreme. “The outcome is that you successfully manage or navigate that adverse experience and get back to living your life.”

You don’t have to be a superhero to be resilient 

“Resilience is probably more ubiquitous than we think but it’s also more complex,” says Jayawickreme. He points to post-traumatic growth research showing that some people can experience positive changes through adversity.” Yet, he cautions, this taps into a powerful superhero myth: “The idea that bad things often transform you into someone significantly and qualitatively different and better than before; a phoenix from the ashes.” 

Domains of post-traumatic growth include appreciation of life, improved relationships, personal strength, spiritual change, and discovering new possibilities. “But actual post-traumatic growth, improving beyond your original baseline, is rare. We often idealize growth,” says Jayawickreme. “Some people may develop virtues like compassion after adversity, but most either endure and return or struggle to get back to where they were.”

Psychologist George Bonanno, a professor of clinical psychology at Columbia University, outlines four typical responses to major stressors: resilience (sustained functioning), recovery (a dip then return), delayed distress, and chronic dysfunction. 

Resilience & Culture

“All cultures have narratives to explain suffering, particularly unearned suffering,” says Jayawickreme. “They help address the question: Why do bad things happen to good people?” 

In Buddhist contexts, karma offers one explanation. In Western cultures, a Christ-inspired idea of redemptive suffering often prevails. In Islam, suffering can be seen as a path to patience and virtue.

“Cultural narratives can help us cope with trauma in the immediate aftermath,” says Jayawickreme. They help us make meaning and minimize the impact of what happened. 

Chronic vs Acute Stressors

Resilience looks different depending on type of stress. The death of a parent versus losing a promotion are very different experiences. “But we could also talk about chronic versus acute stressors,” says Dr. Kendra Thomas, a psychology of psychology at Hope College.

“Acute stressors seem so much worse, but in the long run, they might be easier to recover from,” says Thomas. “Chronic stressors, like never getting a good night’s sleep, means the body never activates its regenerative mechanisms.” 

Sleep, laughter, rest, relationships, “really, really matter for resilience,” she says.

Chronic inflammation from sustained stress erodes the body’s natural mechanisms of healing and resilience.

Thomas shares an example: A child grieving a parent’s death might receive community support, rest, meals, and hugs. But a child being chronically bullied through a phone they sleep beside has no escape. Acute trauma might activate the community. Chronic stress often doesn’t and can be more damaging in the long-term.

When ‘I’m fine’ isn’t fine

“Managing stress is effortful. There’s always a cost to navigate it,” says Jayawickreme. You might be resilient in terms of life satisfaction, spirituality, depressive symptoms but not in other domains.”

People often power through the post-crises to-do lists (paperwork, funeral planning, flood clean-up), but then find themselves compulsively overeating, overspending, drinking, smoking, or numbing out zombie-scrolling online. The takeaway? For resilience, lean into constructive, nourishing tools that support healing. 

Tools for Resilience: What Actually Does (And Doesn’t) Help

Having A Stiff Upper Lip

“That’s a great emergency strategy. It’s not a great life motto or a mantra,” says Thomas. Don’t let things bother you” might be a great immediate line of defense but can suppress real pain. Longterm it may resurface as resentment. 

Going Through the Five Stages Of Grief 

Elisabeth Kübler-Ross’s five stages of grief are well known: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance. “The data has finally caught up to those ideas,” says Thomas. “Those emotions happen simultaneously. Those aren’t distinct stages…and they don’t lay out linearly.”

Experiencing someone passing away suddenly is different than coping with several years of a diagnosed, drawn-out illness. “Sometimes Christmas is going to be so much worse than October,” says Thomas. “Sometimes year two is harder than year one.”

Expecting a linear recovery can make people feel like something’s wrong with them, even when they’re having a common experience.

Finding Someone to Blame and Pursuing Vengeance

From John Wick” to “The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo,” pop culture often portrays vengeance as a powerful response to trauma. “It’s so gratifying to watch those movies because it puts the victim in a position of power,” says Thomas. “But it’s shortsighted…It doesn’t include forgiveness.”

“When that person actually does gain vengeance,” she adds, “it’s usually a much emptier feeling than expected. Maybe the movie ends right before the emptiness.”

Vengeance, she says, is a human expression of the desire for justice. But it steers toward anger, not healing. “It’s not a virtue. True healing comes through justice, mercy, and forgiveness together.”

Taking Care Of Your Body

“One way we can nurture resilience is to activate the body’s regenerative mechanisms,” says Thomas. “By strengthening the body, you also strengthen the mind.” Laughter, good sleep, nutrition, exercise, even reading, these all help. Supportive relationships and emotional support, she adds, are powerful tools of resilience.

Going To Therapy 

Therapy can be long-term or brief. What matters most is helping people name, reframe, make meaning of what hurts, and plan a path forward. “In our studies, we see that some people with family histories are much more likely to have problems and depression,” says Dr. Myrna Weissman, a professor at Columbia University and former World Health Organization consultant.

A strong network of people you can rely on is vital (spouse, parents, trusted friends, clergy). “People who will just let you be and talk honestly, that’s very, very important,” says Weissman.

She says that people suffering from despair often don’t really understand what’s going on. They go to the doctor for a headache or stomach pain, but what’s really keeping them up is trouble at home or work. “You need to name succinctly what’s really troubling you, and that takes practice,” she says. Therapy can offer that clarity. And sometimes, so can adversity. “You come to understand your values more deeply.”

For many around the world, therapy is a luxury. In conflict zones, Jayawickreme says, people don’t have time to process trauma. They have to move on quickly survive. In those contexts, “healing may come through community, rituals, or spiritual practice.”

Social Infrastructure and Shared Resilience

“In low-income countries, the best thing you can do to improve mental health is to give people resources,” says Jayawickreme, referencing his co-authored American Psychologist article “Rethinking Resilience and Posttraumatic Growth.”

He argues resilience is systemic as well as personal. Food, housing, education, institutions, community status, and compassionate leadership all shape our ability to recover.“It’s really important to think about how people function in a context that either promotes or inhibits resilience.”

The Power of Community Support and Interpersonal Relationships

Every expert returned to one theme: we heal in connection and community.“Sharing what you’re going through with others who’ve experienced it, too, can be helpful,” says Weissman. Churches, civic groups, and neighborhoods can offer vital support, so long as blame and bitterness don’t take over. That’s why veterans often turn to other veterans, or why 12-step programs are built on shared experience.

Community-based recovery doesn’t have to be formal. It might be a chess club, a grandparent, a trusted friend. “People thrive when they have a purpose and feel they belong,” says Thomas. 

Children, she notes, need adults to help build resilience. They lack the power to change their world.

“Too often we demand resilience without offering support…We say, ‘Toughen up,’ when what builds resilience is sleep, being heard, and truly being listened to.”

Interpersonal relationships are a cornerstone of post-traumatic growth. Jayawickreme’s research also shows that values like helpfulness and respect for authority often correlate with stronger resilience, perhaps because those individuals are better at coordinating efforts and receiving support.

“Things do get better under the right circumstances,” says Thomas. “And the right circumstances are almost always community-based recovery.” 

Hope: A Practice and a Virtue

Thomas led a study on hope and resilience in South Africa. The most hopeful people had faced profound loss and grief. “They told stories of adversity and pain and what they chose to do with it. That’s hope. That’s resilience.” 

The Zulu word for hope is ithemba. “We translated it as virtuous hope,” says Thomas. Not just optimism, but a moral commitment to hope that shows up in action: A grandmother saving for a grandchild’s education. A parent who sacrifices. “Hope is often rooted in community.”

Jayawickreme agrees,“Being able to cultivate hope, an expectation that the future will be good or better than today is critical to resilience.”


Alene Dawson is a Southern California-based writer known for her intelligent and popular features, cover stories, interviews, and award-winning publications. She’s a regular contributor to the LA Times.